Skip to main content

Impact & Business for Good

The Impact Design Checklist for Customer Operations

A practical checklist for building Ownership, Location, Employment, and Mission considerations into customer-operations sourcing without losing sight of operating fit. Use it to define the goal, source relevant providers, evaluate evidence, structure the decision, and measure only what the program can support.

ArenaCXTool · Open Resource / Download · Checklist · Fillable PDF + Editable DOCX
Three customer-operations leaders reviewing a structured sourcing checklist together in a contemporary executive workspace.

Turn intent into an operating decision

Impact goals become useful when they change the way a sourcing decision is designed. That means defining what matters, deciding what evidence is required, evaluating impact alongside operating requirements, and being precise about what will be measured after launch.

Download the checklist

Download the Impact Design Checklist for Customer Operations as a fillable PDF or editable Word document. Both formats contain the same substantive checklist.

Three customer-operations leaders reviewing an Impact sourcing checklist together in a contemporary executive workspace, with visual cues representing Ownership, Location, Employment, and Mission.

Start with four lenses, not one label

LensWhat to establish
OwnershipWho owns the provider. Use classifications only where they are accurate and supportable.
LocationWhere the work is performed. Consider the economic context of the geography without assuming that location alone proves impact.
EmploymentWho gets access to the work. Define the population precisely and verify the employment model rather than relying on broad claims.
MissionWhy the provider exists and which communities it seeks to serve. Mission or affiliation alone is not evidence of operating fit or impact.

Use the checklist across five stages

StageDecision discipline
DEFINEAgree on impact goals, definitions, evidence expectations, weighting, and the operating requirements that cannot be compromised.
SOURCELook for capable providers with relevant characteristics and request the evidence needed to validate those characteristics.
EVALUATEAssess impact evidence beside capability, delivery model, commercials, risk, and implementation fit so tradeoffs stay visible.
SELECT & STRUCTUREChoose the provider or provider mix that fits the complete need, then document commitments, governance, and any impact requirements.
MEASURETrack agreed indicators only where definitions, data sources, ownership, and reporting cadence are sufficiently reliable.

Download the editable checklist to work through these questions with sourcing, operations, procurement, workforce, legal/compliance, and other stakeholders as appropriate.

ArenaCX framework showing operating fit as the gate, four Impact lenses, and five sourcing stages from Define through Measure.

Five failure modes the checklist is designed to prevent

  • Adding an impact label after the sourcing decision instead of translating the goal into decision criteria.
  • Treating ownership, geography, affiliation, or mission language as proof without validating the relevant evidence.
  • Combining operating and impact criteria so tightly that tradeoffs disappear instead of remaining explicit.
  • Promising employment, customer, economic, certification, set-aside, or compliance outcomes that the underlying program does not establish.
  • Measuring indicators that lack a clear definition, reliable data source, accountable owner, or useful reporting cadence.

A note for public-sector and supplier-diversity use cases

Impact characteristics can be relevant to public-sector, subcontracting, workforce, geographic, or supplier-participation strategies, but they do not automatically satisfy statutory, certification, set-aside, subcontracting-plan, or diversity requirements. Validate the applicable program rules and provider eligibility separately.

Download

Download the Impact Design Checklist for Customer Operations as a fillable PDF or editable Word document. Both formats contain the same substantive checklist.